domain:tvtropes.org
JulianRota
2yr ago
I'm partial to Vim for all my development needs
JulianRota
2yr ago
I don't think we support hosting video directly, but links to Youtube etc should probably be treated decently
Are you claiming that the laws of aviation are a social construct? That's bold
TonyZa
2yr ago
antidisestablishment
2yr ago
There's an edit button on text posts but it doesn't seem to work.
antidisestablishment
2yr ago
These days visual studio code ends up doing everything I need it to. Vim on the cli.
](/images/1659111263008665.webp)
gattsuru
2yr ago
There's a lot of good things to be said about Notepad++, but unfortunately one of them is that it doesn't have a good *nix variant. And I loathe the Atom-descended stuff.
So I've been stuck with emacs.
Apropos of nothing: '); DROP TABLE comments;--
](/images/16591310888894029.webp)
JamPaladin
2yr ago
▲
▲ ▲
TheMotte can Triforce
Edit: TheMotte CANNOT Triforce.
blackstampede
2yr ago
You did it wrong
dukeleto
2yr ago
308
Special Characters
ASCII punctuation. All of these characters may need to be escaped in some
contexts. Divided into three groups based on (US-layout) keyboard position.
,./;'[]-=
<>?:"{}|_+
!@#$%^&*()`~
Non-whitespace C0 controls: U+0001 through U+0008, U+000E through U+001F,
and U+007F (DEL)
Often forbidden to appear in various text-based file formats (e.g. XML),
or reused for internal delimiters on the theory that they should never
appear in input.
The next line may appear to be blank or mojibake in some viewers.
Non-whitespace C1 controls: U+0080 through U+0084 and U+0086 through U+009F.
Commonly misinterpreted as additional graphic characters.
The next line may appear to be blank, mojibake, or dingbats in some viewers.
Whitespace: all of the characters with category Zs, Zl, or Zp (in Unicode
version 8.0.0), plus U+0009 (HT), U+000B (VT), U+000C (FF), U+0085 (NEL),
and U+200B (ZERO WIDTH SPACE), which are in the C categories but are often
treated as whitespace in some contexts.
This file unfortunately cannot express strings containing
U+0000, U+000A, or U+000D (NUL, LF, CR).
The next line may appear to be blank or mojibake in some viewers.
The next line may be flagged for "trailing whitespace" in some viewers.
Unicode additional control characters: all of the characters with
general category Cf (in Unicode 8.0.0).
The next line may appear to be blank or mojibake in some viewers.
"Byte order marks", U+FEFF and U+FFFE, each on its own line.
The next two lines may appear to be blank or mojibake in some viewers.
Unicode Symbols
Strings which contain common unicode symbols (e.g. smart quotes)
Ω≈ç√∫˜µ≤≥÷
åß∂ƒ©˙∆˚¬…æ
œ∑´®†¥¨ˆøπ“‘
¡™£¢∞§¶•ªº–≠
¸˛Ç◊ı˜Â¯˘¿
ÅÍÎÏ˝ÓÔÒÚÆ☃
Œ„´‰ˇÁ¨ˆØ∏”’
`⁄€‹›fifl‡°·‚—±
⅛⅜⅝⅞
ЁЂЃЄЅІЇЈЉЊЋЌЍЎЏАБВГДЕЖЗИЙКЛМНОПРСТУФХЦЧШЩЪЫЬЭЮЯабвгдежзийклмнопрстуфхцчшщъыьэюя
٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩
Unicode Subscript/Superscript/Accents
Strings which contain unicode subscripts/superscripts; can cause rendering issues
⁰⁴⁵
₀₁₂
⁰⁴⁵₀₁₂
ด้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็ ด้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็ ด้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้้้้็็็็็้้้้้็็็็
Quotation Marks
Strings which contain misplaced quotation marks; can cause encoding errors
'
"
''
""
'"'
"''''"'"
"'"'"''''"
<foo val=`bar' />
Two-Byte Characters
Strings which contain two-byte characters: can cause rendering issues or character-length issues
田中さんにあげて下さい
パーティーへ行かないか
和製漢語
部落格
사회과학원 어학연구소
찦차를 타고 온 펲시맨과 쑛다리 똠방각하
社會科學院語學研究所
울란바토르
𠜎𠜱𠝹𠱓𠱸𠲖𠳏
Strings which contain two-byte letters: can cause issues with naïve UTF-16 capitalizers which think that 16 bits == 1 character
𐐜 𐐔𐐇𐐝𐐀𐐡𐐇𐐓 𐐙𐐊𐐡𐐝𐐓/𐐝𐐇𐐗𐐊𐐤𐐔 𐐒𐐋𐐗 𐐒𐐌 𐐜 𐐡𐐀𐐖𐐇𐐤𐐓𐐝 𐐱𐑂 𐑄 𐐔𐐇𐐝𐐀𐐡𐐇𐐓 𐐏𐐆𐐅𐐤𐐆𐐚𐐊𐐡𐐝𐐆𐐓𐐆
Special Unicode Characters Union
A super string recommended by VMware Inc. Globalization Team: can effectively cause rendering issues or character-length issues to validate product globalization readiness.
表 CJK_UNIFIED_IDEOGRAPHS (U+8868)
ポ KATAKANA LETTER PO (U+30DD)
あ HIRAGANA LETTER A (U+3042)
A LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A (U+0041)
鷗 CJK_UNIFIED_IDEOGRAPHS (U+9DD7)
ΠLATIN SMALL LIGATURE OE (U+0153)
é LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH ACUTE (U+00E9)
Ｂ FULLWIDTH LATIN CAPITAL LETTER B (U+FF22)
逍 CJK_UNIFIED_IDEOGRAPHS (U+900D)
Ü LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS (U+00FC)
ß LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S (U+00DF)
ª FEMININE ORDINAL INDICATOR (U+00AA)
ą LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH OGONEK (U+0105)
ñ LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH TILDE (U+00F1)
丂 CJK_UNIFIED_IDEOGRAPHS (U+4E02)
㐀 CJK Ideograph Extension A, First (U+3400)
𠀀 CJK Ideograph Extension B, First (U+20000)
表ポあA鷗ŒéＢ逍Üߪąñ丂㐀𠀀
Changing length when lowercased
Characters which increase in length (2 to 3 bytes) when lowercased
Credit: https://twitter.com/jifa/status/625776454479970304
Ⱥ
Ⱦ
Japanese Emoticons
Strings which consists of Japanese-style emoticons which are popular on the web
ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ﾉ
(｡◕ ∀ ◕｡)
｀ｨ(´∀｀∩
__ﾛ(,_,*)
・(￣∀￣)・:*:
ﾟ･✿ヾ╲(｡◕‿◕｡)╱✿･ﾟ
,。・::・゜’( ☻ ω ☻ )。・::・゜’
(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻)
(ﾉಥ益ಥ）ﾉ ┻━┻
┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
¯_(ツ)_/¯
dukeleto
2yr ago
test
Zalgo Text
Strings which contain "corrupted" text. The corruption will not appear in non-HTML text, however. (via http://www.eeemo.net)
Ṱ̺̺̕o͞ ̷i̲̬͇̪͙n̝̗͕v̟̜̘̦͟o̶̙̰̠kè͚̮̺̪̹̱̤ ̖t̝͕̳̣̻̪͞h̼͓̲̦̳̘̲e͇̣̰̦̬͎ ̢̼̻̱̘h͚͎͙̜̣̲ͅi̦̲̣̰̤v̻͍e̺̭̳̪̰-m̢iͅn̖̺̞̲̯̰d̵̼̟͙̩̼̘̳ ̞̥̱̳̭r̛̗̘e͙p͠r̼̞̻̭̗e̺̠̣͟s̘͇̳͍̝͉e͉̥̯̞̲͚̬͜ǹ̬͎͎̟̖͇̤t͍̬̤͓̼̭͘ͅi̪̱n͠g̴͉ ͏͉ͅc̬̟h͡a̫̻̯͘o̫̟̖͍̙̝͉s̗̦̲.̨̹͈̣
̡͓̞ͅI̗̘̦͝n͇͇͙v̮̫ok̲̫̙͈i̖͙̭̹̠̞n̡̻̮̣̺g̲͈͙̭͙̬͎ ̰t͔̦h̞̲e̢̤ ͍̬̲͖f̴̘͕̣è͖ẹ̥̩l͖͔͚i͓͚̦͠n͖͍̗͓̳̮g͍ ̨o͚̪͡f̘̣̬ ̖̘͖̟͙̮c҉͔̫͖͓͇͖ͅh̵̤̣͚͔á̗̼͕ͅo̼̣̥s̱͈̺̖̦̻͢.̛̖̞̠̫̰
̗̺͖̹̯͓Ṯ̤͍̥͇͈h̲́e͏͓̼̗̙̼̣͔ ͇̜̱̠͓͍ͅN͕͠e̗̱z̘̝̜̺͙p̤̺̹͍̯͚e̠̻̠͜r̨̤͍̺̖͔̖̖d̠̟̭̬̝͟i̦͖̩͓͔̤a̠̗̬͉̙n͚͜ ̻̞̰͚ͅh̵͉i̳̞v̢͇ḙ͎͟-҉̭̩̼͔m̤̭̫i͕͇̝̦n̗͙ḍ̟ ̯̲͕͞ǫ̟̯̰̲͙̻̝f ̪̰̰̗̖̭̘͘c̦͍̲̞͍̩̙ḥ͚a̮͎̟̙͜ơ̩̹͎s̤.̝̝ ҉Z̡̖̜͖̰̣͉̜a͖̰͙̬͡l̲̫̳͍̩g̡̟̼̱͚̞̬ͅo̗͜.̟
̦H̬̤̗̤͝e͜ ̜̥̝̻͍̟́w̕h̖̯͓o̝͙̖͎̱̮ ҉̺̙̞̟͈W̷̼̭a̺̪͍į͈͕̭͙̯̜t̶̼̮s̘͙͖̕ ̠̫̠B̻͍͙͉̳ͅe̵h̵̬͇̫͙i̹͓̳̳̮͎̫̕n͟d̴̪̜̖ ̰͉̩͇͙̲͞ͅT͖̼͓̪͢h͏͓̮̻e̬̝̟ͅ ̤̹̝W͙̞̝͔͇͝ͅa͏͓͔̹̼̣l̴͔̰̤̟͔ḽ̫.͕
Z̮̞̠͙͔ͅḀ̗̞͈̻̗Ḷ͙͎̯̹̞͓G̻O̭̗̮
Unicode Upsidedown
Strings which contain unicode with an "upsidedown" effect (via http://www.upsidedowntext.com)
˙ɐnbᴉlɐ ɐuƃɐɯ ǝɹolop ʇǝ ǝɹoqɐl ʇn ʇunpᴉpᴉɔuᴉ ɹodɯǝʇ poɯsnᴉǝ op pǝs 'ʇᴉlǝ ƃuᴉɔsᴉdᴉpɐ ɹnʇǝʇɔǝsuoɔ 'ʇǝɯɐ ʇᴉs ɹolop ɯnsdᴉ ɯǝɹo˥
00˙Ɩ$-
Unicode font
Strings which contain bold/italic/etc. versions of normal characters
Ｔｈｅ ｑｕｉｃｋ ｂｒｏｗｎ ｆｏｘ ｊｕｍｐｓ ｏｖｅｒ ｔｈｅ ｌａｚｙ ｄｏｇ
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤 𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐱 𝐣𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐬 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐳𝐲 𝐝𝐨𝐠
𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝖖𝖚𝖎𝖈𝖐 𝖇𝖗𝖔𝖜𝖓 𝖋𝖔𝖝 𝖏𝖚𝖒𝖕𝖘 𝖔𝖛𝖊𝖗 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖑𝖆𝖟𝖞 𝖉𝖔𝖌
𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒄𝒌 𝒃𝒓𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒇𝒐𝒙 𝒋𝒖𝒎𝒑𝒔 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒂𝒛𝒚 𝒅𝒐𝒈
𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓬𝓴 𝓫𝓻𝓸𝔀𝓷 𝓯𝓸𝔁 𝓳𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓼 𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓵𝓪𝔃𝔂 𝓭𝓸𝓰
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕢𝕦𝕚𝕔𝕜 𝕓𝕣𝕠𝕨𝕟 𝕗𝕠𝕩 𝕛𝕦𝕞𝕡𝕤 𝕠𝕧𝕖𝕣 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕝𝕒𝕫𝕪 𝕕𝕠𝕘
𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚌𝚔 𝚋𝚛𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚏𝚘𝚡 𝚓𝚞𝚖𝚙𝚜 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚍𝚘𝚐
⒯⒣⒠ ⒬⒰⒤⒞⒦ ⒝⒭⒪⒲⒩ ⒡⒪⒳ ⒥⒰⒨⒫⒮ ⒪⒱⒠⒭ ⒯⒣⒠ ⒧⒜⒵⒴ ⒟⒪⒢
Hmm, it looks like I don't even need to learn new markup...
+++
The Dobbs megathread is over a week old now, and never did reach 2000 posts, so I think it's probably safe to let it lapse... that said, I have been thinking a lot about one of these charts over the past week, and wondered what you all might make of it.
I hate the labels "pro-life" and "pro-choice," for what I think are well-trod reasons. A majority of Americans favor some restrictions on abortion. A majority of Americans oppose a blanket ban. Setting the poles of the debate at "all or nothing" creates duelling purity spirals that tear apart all the reasoned and nuanced discussion between those positions. But one of the most famous "pro-choice" essays in the philosophical literature, where Judith Jarvis Thompson introduces the violinist case, concludes:
By contrast, if you check the Republican Party platform, it states unequivocally:
The Democratic Party platform is arguably more equivocal, but "every woman should be able to access...safe and legal abortion" does strictly include abortion for women who are 40 weeks pregnant:
Back to the Gallup poll--check the chart called "Trends in Preferred Abortion Label, by Gender." In May of 2022, a historical high of 61% of women identified as "pro-choice." This is just three years after 2019's poll, in which a quarter-century high of 51% of women identified as pro-life. This change is substantially underwritten by a rather abrupt explosion of "legal under any circumstances" women, and collapse of "illegal in all circumstances" women. Just at a guess, timing wise the polls go
In other words, people tend to default toward pro-life type positions (or pro-life type positions just get more consistently pushed), but dropping abortion into the news cycle shifts people quickly back toward pro-choice type positions. And "all-time high" may be a little misleading, as the mid-1990s saw similarly high "legal under any circumstances" support from women (37% then, 38% today).
I know that many of you did not live through the 1990s, or were too young to be aware of the culture wars, but culturally it was an era of fairly strident feminism. Hillary Clinton was personally responsible for some small part of that, but so was Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), to say nothing of Hollywood. Disney's Beauty and the Beast (1991) deliberately appealed to feminist tropes, "girl power" was, if not coined, at least popularized in that era (the Spice Girls played some role in this, though more recently they have disavowed the slogan, for presumably CW-adjacent reasons). All this is in turn downstream from the feminism of the 1980s and 1970s, or maybe arguably a culmination of those influences. By the 1990s, though, all the fresh-faced feminists of the Summer of Love had grown up, gotten jobs, had children, and otherwise installed themselves into positions of influence, even if only as reliably Democratic voters.
There is a lot of debate about "wave" feminism and what each "wave" entails, but whether these numbers indicate a new "wave" of feminism, they seem to indicate something. The salience of "women's issues" is particularly great in a nation where women consistently outnumber men at the polls, by fairly wide margins. So for almost one woman in five to go from labeling herself "pro-life" to "pro-choice" in the space of three years seems like an important shift, even if drilling down into those numbers reveals more nuanced attitudes that are mostly within historically-attested ranges.
Since Dobbs has moved the issue to the states, where there are fifty wildly-diverse legislative and judicial bodies prepared to fuck things up in a million new and exciting ways, this is likely to go on for several years at least. I anticipate media amping the feminist signal (here is a young adult books editor calling for abortion books in a since-deleted tweet, for example) akin to what we saw in the 1990s, building on the memetic success of the execrable and behindhanded "Handmaid's Tale." What is unclear to me is the payoff.
Painting with a broad brush, if we think of first wave feminism as receding once suffrage was secured, and second wave feminism as receding once it eliminated legal barriers to women's social equality, third wave feminism arguably came for the "systemic" bits, the left-over oppression that persisted in civilization's social and political habits--like "gender identity" and "gender roles." Each wave of feminism contains seeds of its successor (all are a part of the same ocean) but still there are clustered trends. So what's left for feminism after that? More specifically: what difference between men and women remains to be erased? And how does "legal abortion under any circumstances" capture it?
(My own hasty guess is something like "finding ways to eliminate the biological differences between men and women," but I see the face of transhumanism on tortillas and burnt toast so possibly I am not a reliable analyst in this regard.)
More options
Context Copy link